prof_pangaea: (river fucks your shit up)
prof_pangaea ([personal profile] prof_pangaea) wrote2010-04-07 08:42 pm
Entry tags:

a ~mystery~



discuss.

[identity profile] biichan.livejournal.com 2010-04-08 03:03 am (UTC)(link)
Definitely deliberate.

So basically, Amy could totally be the first non-spin-off "historical" companion in an age. Which would be awesome to my mind, even if the "historical period" is less than twenty years ago. And hey, if this turns out to be true, she comes BUILT IN with an excuse for lazy fic-writers that get the nineties wrong.

[identity profile] prof-pangaea.livejournal.com 2010-04-08 06:21 am (UTC)(link)
ha, remember when people (or at least... me) were wondering if the pic of karen gillan in the plaid shirt and jeans meant amy was going to be from the early 90's? maybe we were correct ALL ALONG.

[identity profile] kels.livejournal.com 2010-04-08 06:28 am (UTC)(link)
I remember that, and I thought it meant that she'd be from the 1980s.

[identity profile] biichan.livejournal.com 2010-04-08 05:52 pm (UTC)(link)
THAT WOULD BE AWESOME.